Over the past decade, the global
green building market has experienced remarkable growth, spurred by a
heightened emphasis on corporate sustainability. With projections indicating a
market value set to exceed $377 billion by 2026, it’s evident that sustainability
has become a paramount concern for business worldwide.
At the forefront of this movement
are certifications like BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental
Assessment Method) and LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design),
widely regarded as benchmarks for environmentally friendly construction
practices. However, amidst this surge in green building initiatives, questions
loom regarding the efficacy of these certifications in truly reducing carbon
emissions and fostering meaningful sustainability.
The popularity of Green building
certifications
Green building certifications
emerged in the 1990s as a response to the environmental impact of the
construction industry, which accounts for 39% of global energy-related carbon
emissions. These certifications, epitomised by BREEAM and LEED, were envisioned
as tools to help ensure buildings reduce their carbon output. While their
impact on carbon emissions remains subject to debate, they have undeniably
sparked crucial conversations about sustainability and raised awareness among
corporations and stakeholders.
The allure of green certifications lies in their potential to enhance corporate reputations and financial returns. For many companies, obtaining these certificates serves as a badge of eco-friendliness, bolstering their public image and satisfying regulatory requirements without delving deeper into their substantive environmental impact. Additionally, studies have shown that green-certified buildings command higher market values, further incentivising businesses to pursue these credentials. However, this emphasis on optics and financial gains has overshadowed the core mission of reducing carbon emissions, raising doubts about the value of green building certifications.
Challenges and limitations
Despite their widespread
adoption, green building certifications face several challenges that undermine
their effectiveness. One notable issue is the lack of standardised reporting
and independent data on their environmental impact. Additionally, the proliferation
of different certification regimes has led to confusion and inconsistency in
defining sustainability standards. Variances between leading certifications
like BREEAM and LEED further compound this problem, highlighting disparities in
evaluation processes and criteria.
Furthermore, the high costs
associated with obtaining these certifications create barriers to entry,
limiting accessibility and perpetuating inequities within the industry. This
financial burden, coupled with administrative complexities, detracts from businesses’
ability to prioritise meaningful sustainability measures over bureaucratic
compliance.
Exploring alternative
approaches
It is clear that green building
certification is an important step towards creating a sustainable future. The
construction of green building is a major component of the global shift towards
a more eco-friendly lifestyle. However, it is not enough to simply design and
construct a green building and achieve a certification. To truly build
sustainability and make sure that the environment isn’t compromised in the
process, we must look beyond certification and strive for greater efficiency in
every aspect of design and construction.
For example, many green certified
buildings still rely heavily on fossil fuels for energy efficiency and
heating/cooling systems. Although this may be necessary to meet the standards
for certification, more could be done to reduce reliance on these non-renewable
resources. By making small changes such as replacing traditional light bulbs
with LED bulbs and installing renewable energy sources like solar panels,
buildings can go beyond basic green certifications and pursue true
sustainability.
Furthermore, green certified
buildings often don’t consider indoor air quality or water conservation. While
it is crucial to focus on external factors such as energy efficiency, it is
just as important to focus on internal factors. By implementing measures such
as using non-toxic cleaning products or low flow shower heads, buildings can
become even more sustainable than those with only a green certification badge.
Amidst mounting scepticism
surrounding traditional green building certifications, there is a growing call
for alternative approaches to sustainability in the construction sector. One
such solution lies in embracing comprehensive business certifications like
Planet Mark of B Corp, which integrate broader sustainability criteria and
offer a more holistic assessment of companies’ environmental commitments. By
shifting focus from individual buildings to overarching business practices,
organisations can align sustainability efforts with their core values and
strategic objectives.
Moreover, businesses can pursue
sustainability through practical, tangible measures such as low-carbon
retrofitting and investments in values-aligned maintenance companies. By
prioritising internal improvements and operational changes, companies can achieve
meaningful carbon reductions without solely relying on third-party
certifications.
Redefining sustainability
Looking ahead, it is imperative
for businesses to recalibrate their approach to sustainability in workplaces.
Rather than viewing green building certifications as the sole arbiter of
environmental responsibility, organisations should prioritise holistic strategies
that address the root causes of carbon emissions. This includes embracing
innovative practices like low-carbon retrofitting, minimise waste and optimise
material usage. Through pragmatic, impactful strategies rather than symbolic
gestures, organisations can make meaningful contributions to carbon reduction
and catalyse positive change in the climate crisis.
As the urgency of climate change
intensifies, the important for sustainable practices in the construction
industry to become increasingly widespread.
By transcending the confines of green building certifications and
embracing comprehensive approaches to sustainability, businesses can manage
their environmental impact and foster a more resilient future. It is also key
that stakeholders across the sector collaborate to navigate the complexities of
sustainability and chart a course towards a greener built environment for
generations to come.
For
more information visit
